|  
             Recently 
              12 men died in a fire in a building in Vishwas Nagar. The building 
              in which they had been locked by their employer for the night was 
              an 'illegal' garments factory. Vishwas Nagar is crowded to bursting 
              point with such illegal industries and their presence is common 
              knowledge to all. These warren holes are severe fire and health 
              hazards, yet their existence has come close to being legalised. 
              Following on the heels of this tragedy, a week later, was an explosion 
              in a spray painting unit. The unit was located in a building which 
              also houses a school, in South Delhi's Madanpur Khadar village. 
              Two workers died in the blast. The Industries Minister's callous 
              response to these deaths was, "This is nature. The tsunami 
              also happened, who could have prevented it"? 
            Other 
              than a reflection of the gentlemans general lack of sensitivity, 
              the statement inadvertently provides an adequate metaphor for the 
              conditions that prevail within these areas, which could some day 
              unleash a catastrophe of enormous proportions. These pockets of 
              illegal industries are not unique to Delhi alone, but are to be 
              found in cities across the country. As we grapple today with the 
              pressing issue of 'urbanisation' how do we fit in such anomalies 
              as 'illegal colonies', 'illegal industries', 'urban villages' and 
              'Lal Dora' into the context of planned development? 
            Today 
              half of the chaos that is the Indian city has been caused by the 
              presence of such categories on the urban map. It takes a severe 
              stretching of common sense to believe that we can even be close 
              to building liveable and healthy cities, when such structures are 
              allowed to proliferate with gay abandon. 
            To 
              just take the 'Lal Dora' as a case in point. Meaning, literally, 
              'red thread', the term was used to demarcate the jurisdiction of 
              a village. Today, it is the territory of a village within which 
              the norms and controls of a municipality or urban development authority 
              are not applicable. Armed with this immunity, the Lal Dora has assumed 
              qualities of a hydra-headed monster. Once far removed from the city, 
              these concentrations have now been surrounded by the urban rampage, 
              converted abruptly into prime real estate, with the original inhabitants 
              struggling to hold out against unbelievable deals for their small 
              holdings. Delhi has witnessed the transformation of numerous such 
              'urban villages', with their traditional architecture transmogrified 
              into teetering towers of concrete, steel and glass.  
            Commercial 
              enterprises flock to these 'villages' in order to reap the benefits 
              of loopholes in archaic laws. Interestingly, in many of these Lal 
              Dora areas, shops and establishments have been set up by 'upmarket' 
              and wealthy entrepreneurs, who exploit these lacunae in order to 
              escape paying the price for properties which they can well afford. 
              Take a look at Delhi's MG road. Spoken of in bated breath by shoppers, 
              "MG Road 1" has today been transformed into a hangout 
              for the well-heeled 'fashion set' who flock to the many 'designer 
              labels' housed in this complex. These enterprises continue their 
              businesses even though the building is 'illegal' and under notice 
              - currently contested in Court - of demolition. Such notices and 
              the lacklustre efforts by the administration to take action long 
              after these buildings have been constructed and occupied, deter 
              no one, and several other buildings are already up and running next 
              to MG Road 1, also pushing for 'regularisation'. 
            Reaching 
              out beyond Delhi, a recent study conducted by the Centre for Research 
              in Rural and Industrial Development revealed that, of a 196 acres 
              of Panchayat land in the Chandigarh UT, 33.5 acres was under 
              encroachments. In the Raipur Khurd Village along the Chandigarh-Ambala 
              Highway, out of a total of 95 acres of Panchayat land, at 
              least 25 acres in prime locations had been encroached upon, in most 
              cases by speculators and businesses seeking to exploit the tax cuts 
              these areas enjoy. 
            Only 
              in one case was an attempt made to exploit these villages commercially 
              without disturbing the architectural consonance of the area, or 
              directly harming the interests of the original owners. The Hauz 
              Khas Village experiment started out well enough and the intent was 
              laudable. Situated near the historic monuments of Hauz Khas, the 
              village provided a picturesque backdrop for the location of boutiques 
              and restaurants, but with the proviso that no building or gali would 
              be altered or broken or replaced with a modern structure - a sharp 
              contrast to the developments along MG Road. 
            Similar 
              experiments, intended at once to protect the original social and 
              architectural forms and the interests of the residents, have been 
              tried in the West and have proven to be major successes. Such arrangement 
              brought the wealth of the surrounding and dynamic urban concentrations 
              into these depleted rural oases, at once integrating them into the 
              new economy, even as the original character of the village remaining 
              unaltered. Such 'villages', today, are major tourist attractions 
              across cities and towns in Europe.  
            The 
              effort to import this concept into India started with a lone initiative 
              at Hauz Khas Village, with the establishment of an up-market boutique, 
              but it was soon followed by a rash of imitators. Unfortunately, 
              within a short while, instead of a rejuvenated 'heritage village' 
              there was an untidy mess of shops, with cars choking the village 
              entry, and shoppers negotiating dirt tracks sodden with the weight 
              of mounds of cow dung, gawking at elderly gentlemen enjoying their 
              afternoon siesta or a leisurely smoke on the hookah. As the market 
              took off, every corner turned into a shop or restaurant, and soon 
              the idea collapsed under the weight of this unrestrained commercialization. 
              The area has, today, gone significantly to seed, though some quality 
              establishments continue to do business there.  
            The 
              idea failed in the Indian context because no effort was made to 
              assess the carrying-capacity of the village - and also because, 
              as the only experiment of its kind, it attracted far too many enterprises 
              seeking to cash in on the success of the first few boutiques. Worse, 
              the success of the original enterprise saw no real efforts to replicate 
              the essentials of the experiment in other villages - rather, it 
              led to a discovery by developers and unscrupulous entrepreneurs 
              that there were large gaps in the laws governing these Lal Dora 
              areas, and that there was money to be made in exploiting these. 
               
            Today, 
              urban villages are nothing but a complete mess of rapid, lawless 
              and chaotic growth. It has been argued that they bring in wealth 
              to the economically backward inhabitants, but such gains are limited 
              and a one-time windfall, as properties change hands. Seldom have 
              such transactions resulted in any building of independent capacities 
              for productive employment among those who are divested of such properties 
              - and the monies are often squandered within a generation, leaving 
              successors in penury. At the same time, these urban villages turn 
              into shambolic blots on the urban landscape, choking up crucial 
              transport lifelines, mocking every effort to impose some order through 
              patterns of the planned development of the city. Unless we can figure 
              out ways to work out a plan that marries the peculiarities of urban 
              villages with the dictates and necessities of an ordered and planned 
              city, we will continue to see and create urban areas with but a 
              few tiny pockets of superior habitation in the midst of a burgeoning, 
              all-consuming, chaos. 
            Chitvan 
              Gill 
            Published in The Pioneer, December 
              15, 2005 
              
            BACK 
              TO LIST  |