The DDA demonstrates its ‘multi–pronged’ confusion 
                in its plans for improvement of the environment and its management 
                of resources. At the outset, we find a detailed lament on past 
                failures, with the result that, today, “Delhi is considered 
                to be among the most polluted cities in the world,” and 
                that infrastructural shortages, including capacities for water, 
                sewerage treatment, electricity, drainage and solid waste management, 
                are assuming crisis proportions.
              DDA’s latest Master Plan 2021 arouses a sense of profound 
                frustration at its comprehensive inability to manage the city 
                and its resources. There is no evidence of any urgency to map 
                out and plan, in a concrete, time bound manner, the restructuring 
                of Delhi’s environment in a sustainable framework. Instead, 
                we find a continuous repetition of vague clichés and generalized 
                declarations of intent.
              Nothing better describes the rot of the system than the state 
                of the Yamuna – Delhi’s principal water source. The 
                river is so completely contaminated that it is described as ‘dead’ 
                after it reaches the city, where 3,296 million litres per day 
                of raw sewage meet its waters. MPD 2021 offers nothing that could 
                significantly change this. It does, however, suggest “designation 
                and delineation of appropriate land uses and aesthetics of the 
                River Front which should be more fully integrated with the city…” 
                A backdoor clause for more building in an ecologically sensitive 
                zone?
              70 percent of total air pollution is from vehicular emission, 
                the result of a skew in the city’s transport system: buses 
                comprise just 1.2 per cent of the city’s vehicles, but cater 
                to 60 per cent of transport load; cars, 93 per cent of all vehicles, 
                feed just 30 per cent of travel demand. “Public transportation 
                planning must, therefore drive future policy...” The Master 
                Plan notes that part of the problem of vehicular congestion results 
                from “the policy of mixed land use”. But the whole 
                of MPD 2021 is nothing but an elaborate plea for the arbitrary 
                and indiscriminate extension of precisely this policy!
              MPD 2021 notes the failure to maintain “previous Master 
                Plan proposals for retention of Green Belts”. It expects 
                to repair some of this damage by transforming agricultural land 
                “from the NCTD boundary up to a depth of one peripheral 
                revenue village boundary” into a Green Belt, “wherever 
                possible”. But where? Most of the land along the National 
                Capital Territory’s boundaries has already been urbanized 
                or taken up by ‘farmhouses’. 
              There is much that seems to suggest that no one has read through 
                MPD 2021 with any significant care – and worse, that no 
                one is expected to, despite the ritual of ‘public notification’ 
                and ‘invitation of objections and suggestions’.
              The ‘availability and projections’ of capacities 
                on various resources is a dramatic case in point. ‘Requirement’ 
                for water in 2001 is put at 1,096 mgd and the projection for 2021 
                at 1,150; with nearly ten million persons added to Delhi’s 
                population, the additional demand for water is expected to rise 
                by precisely 54 mgd! The DJB itself points out that the DDA has 
                got its projections wrong.
              The same goes for sewerage. 2001 requirements are estimated at 
                877 mgd, estimated to rise to 920 mgd by 2021, a minuscule increment 
                of just 43 mgd. Is the ‘projected population’ never 
                to go to the toilet? Even presuming unprecedented and improbable 
                efficiency in the utilization of these capacities, Delhi’s 
                water bodies will continue to be hugely fouled through 2021. 
              Delhi is one of the dirtiest cities in the world and produces 
                nearly 8,000 tonnes of waste everyday. Civic agencies manage to 
                clear only about 4,884 tonnes of filth and most of the garbage 
                is dumped in open land fills. Solid waste processing requirements 
                in 2001 were 7,100 tons/day and MPD 2021 sees this rising to 15,750 
                – but this seems an underestimate. A Central Pollution Control 
                Board Study has put the anticipated volumes in the region of 17,000 
                – 20,000 tons/day. The grand solution? “…there 
                is no option, but to resort to alternative and decentralized methods 
                of waste treatment, reduction, recycle and use…” And 
                what specific facilities are proposed for these under MPD 2021? 
                These alternatives “should be constituted and made effective”. 
                This tenuous response for a city that is sitting on a ‘garbage 
                bomb’! 
               MPDs projections for power requirements are dismissed by Delhi 
                Transco Limited, the State unit that manages the city’s 
                transmission grid: “Difficulties are created by the continuing 
                mismatch between the situation envisaged in the master plan and 
                the actual ground situation.”
              MPD 2021 is to be executed by the multiplicity of agencies actually 
                charged with the management of various resources and services. 
                Given the very vague and contradictory guidelines and programmes 
                of the Master Plan, they can only be expected to dash, blinkers 
                on, towards uncertain, conflicting and frequently discreditable 
                goals. 
              The writers is Convenor, Urban Futures Initiative
                For detailed analysis: www.ufionline.org
                Feedback and suggestions on the Master Plan: debate@ufionline.org
              
                
              BACK TO LIST
               
              FOR 
                COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS WRITE TO 
              debate@ufionline.org